{"id":639,"date":"2022-03-30T14:37:39","date_gmt":"2022-03-30T12:37:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/bugnion.ch\/?p=639"},"modified":"2022-09-30T14:39:11","modified_gmt":"2022-09-30T12:39:11","slug":"european-patent-artificial-intelligence-and-designation-of-the-inventor","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bugnion.ch\/en\/european-patent-artificial-intelligence-and-designation-of-the-inventor\/","title":{"rendered":"EUROPEAN PATENT &#8211; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND DESIGNATION OF THE INVENTOR"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In accordance with the provisions of article 81 of the European Patent Convention, &#8220;the European patent application must include the designation of the inventor&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>It is on the delicate issue of the &#8220;inventor&#8221; as a subject of rights that the Legal Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office, the first and last jurisdictional instance before the European Patent Office (EPO), issued a decision on December 21, 2021 during a public oral procedure.<\/p>\n<p>Indeed, the inventor named in two European patent applications (EP 18 275 163 and EP 18 275 174) was not a human being (legally a natural person), but an artificial intelligence system.<\/p>\n<p>In dismissing the applicant&#8217;s appeals, The Boards of Appeal confirmed the decisions of the European Patent Office&#8217;s Filing Section, namely that an artificial intelligence (AI) system cannot be designated as an inventor.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">For more information:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.epo.org\/news-events\/news\/2021\/20211221.html\">https:\/\/www.epo.org\/news-events\/news\/2021\/20211221.html<\/a><a class=\"edit-timestamp hide-if-no-js\" role=\"button\" href=\"https:\/\/bugnion.ch\/wp-admin\/post-new.php?lang=en#edit_timestamp\">\u00a0<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In accordance with the provisions of article 81 of the European Patent Convention, &#8220;the European patent application must include the designation of the inventor&#8221;. It is on the delicate issue of the &#8220;inventor&#8221; as a subject of rights that the Legal Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office, the first [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-639","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bugnion.ch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/639","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bugnion.ch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bugnion.ch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bugnion.ch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bugnion.ch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=639"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/bugnion.ch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/639\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":640,"href":"https:\/\/bugnion.ch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/639\/revisions\/640"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bugnion.ch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=639"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}